跟 UMU 一起玩 OpenWRT(入门篇15):ip-tiny 和 ip-full 的区别

起源

今天看到有网文《iptables+tproxy实现ss-redir的UDP转发的方法》说:“OpenWrt 做 UDP 转发需要的依赖是:iptables-mod-tproxy, kmod-ipt-tproxy 和 ip-full”。使用 opkg install ip 安装的默认是 ip-tiny,一般情况下都是够用的,不禁想弄明白两者有何区别。

探索

ip 命令对比测试:

  • ip-tiny
1
2
3
OBJECT := { link | address | route | rule | neigh | tunnel | maddress |
mroute | mrule | monitor | netns | macsec | token | ila |
vrf | sr }
  • ip-full
1
2
3
4
OBJECT := { link | address | addrlabel | route | rule | neigh | ntable |
tunnel | tuntap | maddress | mroute | mrule | monitor | xfrm |
netns | l2tp | fou | macsec | tcp_metrics | token | netconf | ila |
vrf | sr }

即 ip-full 多了这些对象: addrlabel | ntable | tuntap | xfrm | l2tp | fou | tcp_metrics | netconf。举个例子,只安装 ip-tiny 时,运行 ip xfrm 报错如下:

Object “xfrm” is unknown, try “ip help”.

相关知识:

xfrm is an IP framework for transforming packets (such as encrypting
their payloads). This framework is used to implement the IPsec
protocol suite (with the state object operating on the Security
Association Database, and the policy object operating on the Security
Policy Database). It is also used for the IP Payload Compression
Protocol and features of Mobile IPv6.

结论

实际上,转发普通 UDP 包,并不需要 ip-full,ip-tiny 即可。

如果您使用微信,也可以关注公众号 UMU618,在公众号文章里评论。